Court orders Indimi to pay twin daughters $43.5m in dividend dispute

A FEDERAL High Court in Nigeria has directed Oriental Energy Resources Ltd., the oil exploration company founded by billionaire Muhammadu Indimi, to pay $43.51 million to his twin daughters after a prolonged legal battle over unpaid dividends.

The judgment represents a significant victory for Ameena and Zara Indimi, who argued that they were unjustly excluded from a dividend distribution linked to about $435.1 million reportedly declared by the company. Based on the shareholding they claimed, the amount in dispute reflected a combined 10 percent stake in the payout pool.

In their case before the court, the sisters maintained that their respective equity interests in the company had been reduced without due process, effectively denying them dividends they believed were rightfully theirs.

READ ALSO: Supreme Court sends Nestoil, Neconde case back to appeal court over legal representation dispute

Oriental Energy, a Lagos-based exploration and production firm with major offshore assets in the Niger Delta, ranks among Nigeria’s more prominent privately owned upstream operators. Built over decades by Indimi, the business forms part of a broader portfolio spanning energy and financial services.

Neither Indimi nor the company has publicly commented on the ruling. As a privately held operator, Oriental Energy does not routinely disclose detailed financial statements or ownership records, in line with the limited reporting obligations that apply to non-listed Nigerian oil firms.

Although the court ruled in favour of the daughters’ entitlement, public reports have not fully detailed the basis for calculating the $43.51 million award or specified a timeline for compliance. The decision nonetheless strengthens the sisters’ position in any negotiations that may follow.

Attention now shifts to what happens next. Companies facing adverse rulings in Nigeria can pursue appeals or other legal mechanisms that may delay enforcement. Whether the judgment results in prompt payment, extended litigation, or a negotiated settlement will determine if the court’s order brings closure to the dispute or marks another chapter in a continuing family saga.