A COMPREHENSIVE international study has found that people who follow a vegetarian diet may face a significantly reduced risk of developing several major cancers, including pancreatic and prostate cancer, when compared with regular meat eaters.

The research indicates that vegetarians have a 21 percent lower risk of pancreatic cancer and a 12 percent lower risk of prostate cancer. In addition, the study suggests that adopting a vegetarian diet could reduce the likelihood of developing up to five types of cancer by as much as 30 percent, depending on the specific disease.

The large-scale analysis was led by researchers at the University of Oxford and examined cancer outcomes across different dietary groups., BBC reported.

Compared with individuals who consume meat regularly, vegetarians were found to have lower risks of pancreatic, breast, kidney and prostate cancers, as well as multiple myeloma, a cancer that affects plasma cells in the bone marrow.

READ ALSO: Lung cancer drug shows promise in overcoming ovarian cancer drug resistance

In more detailed findings, vegetarians showed a 9 percent lower risk of breast cancer, a 28 percent lower risk of kidney cancer and a 31 percent reduced risk of multiple myeloma. These reductions were measured against the cancer incidence rates recorded among meat eaters, who formed the largest dietary category in the study.

Despite these encouraging results, the researchers also uncovered a contrasting pattern. Vegetarians were found to have almost double the risk of oesophageal cancer compared with those who eat meat. The reason for this elevated risk was not established in the analysis, and the authors noted that the finding requires closer investigation before any firm conclusions can be drawn.

What the study says

The study’s authors stressed that while the associations are statistically significant, they do not prove that meat consumption directly causes cancer or that vegetarian diets automatically provide protection. Instead, the results point to a complex relationship between diet and cancer risk that may involve multiple biological and lifestyle factors.

Tim Key, who co-authored the study and serves as an emeritus professor of epidemiology at the Nuffield Department of Population Health at the University of Oxford, suggested that meat itself may play a central role in explaining the differences. “My feeling is the differences are more likely to be related to meat itself than to simply vegetarians eating more healthy foods,” he said.

However, Key was careful to qualify his remarks, acknowledging that this view remains an informed opinion rather than a proven conclusion. He noted that the research did not directly test whether specific compounds in meat are responsible for the higher risks, nor did it isolate which elements of vegetarian diets might be protective. Further targeted studies, he said, would be required to answer those questions.

The findings were published in the British Journal of Cancer and are described as the most extensive analysis of its kind to date. The researchers pooled data from multiple cohort studies conducted around the world, with the majority of participants coming from the United Kingdom and the United States.

Altogether, the study assessed health and dietary information from 1.64 million meat eaters. It also included 57,016 individuals who consumed poultry but avoided red meat, 42,910 pescatarians who ate fish but no meat, 63,147 vegetarians and 8,849 vegans. This wide range of dietary patterns allowed the researchers to compare cancer incidence across groups with differing levels of animal-product consumption.

No direct causation

While the sheer scale of the study strengthens its statistical power, independent experts have advised against overinterpreting the results. Health Information Manager at Cancer Research UK, Ms Amy Hirst, described the research as robust and informative but cautioned that it does not establish direct causation.

She said the ‘high-quality study’ provides useful insight into how dietary choices might influence cancer risk, yet emphasised that more work is needed in broader and more diverse populations to confirm the patterns observed. According to Hirst, variations in lifestyle, genetics, alcohol consumption, body weight and other health behaviours could also contribute to the differences recorded between dietary groups.

READ ALSO: Positive results emerge on cancer treatment amid rising deaths in Nigerian hospitals

Ms Hirst further stressed that when it comes to reducing cancer risk, maintaining an overall healthy and balanced diet is more important than focusing on individual foods or eliminating specific items. Factors such as consuming adequate fruits and vegetables, limiting processed foods, maintaining a healthy weight and staying physically active all play critical roles in long-term cancer prevention.

Ultimately, the study adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that dietary habits can influence cancer outcomes. However, the researchers and independent experts alike agree that more detailed investigation is required to fully understand the biological mechanisms at work and to determine whether reducing meat consumption directly lowers cancer risk or whether other aspects of vegetarian lifestyles are responsible for the protective effect.