Fragile capital flow structure signals warning for Nigeria – CPPE

AMID the impressive $6.01 billion capital importation recorded in the third quarter (Q3) of 2025, the Centre for the Promotion of Private Enterprise (CPPE) has cautioned that underlying structural weaknesses could threaten the durability of the recovery if not urgently addressed.

The think tank noted that while the surge in inflows reflects improving investor sentiment and confidence in recent macroeconomic reforms, the structure of the capital entering the country raises important concerns about sustainability.

A major risk lies in the dominance of portfolio investments, according to it Director-General, Dr Muda Yusuf. More than 80 percent of the total inflows in Q3 2025 were portfolio-driven, while foreign direct investment (FDI) accounted for less than five percent. According to CPPE, this imbalance exposes Nigeria to the risk of sudden reversals, as portfolio flows are typically short-term and highly sensitive to global financial conditions.

READ ALSO: Fact-Check: Contrary to Tinubu’s claim, Nigerian economy can’t grow to $1trn by 2026

Portfolio investors often bet on short-term securities such as bonds and stocks. They are primarily attracted by high interest rates, improved foreign exchange liquidity, and short-term yield opportunities. While such inflows provide immediate support to foreign reserves and help stabilise the naira, they can exit just as quickly when global risk sentiment changes or when advanced economies adjust their monetary policies.

“Sustainable economic growth, job creation, and export expansion depend not on short-term capital but on stable, long-horizon FDI tied to production, infrastructure, manufacturing, and technology transfer. The current structure therefore reflects cyclical financial recovery rather than structural economic transformation,” Yusuf said.

A tightening cycle in major global markets or a shift in investor perception about emerging market risk could trigger rapid outflows, placing renewed pressure on Nigeria’s exchange rate and external buffers. Dr Yusuf warned that relying heavily on hot money inflows without strengthening the productive base of the economy leaves the country vulnerable to external shocks.

Another key vulnerability is the persistently weak level of FDI. Unlike portfolio flows, FDI is typically tied to long-term projects in manufacturing, infrastructure, energy, and technology. It supports job creation, enhances productivity, and contributes to export diversification.

However, the data show that productive investment remains subdued. CPPE attributed this to enduring structural constraints, including unreliable power supply, high logistics costs, infrastructure deficits, and regulatory unpredictability. Until these constraints are addressed, Nigeria may struggle to attract the kind of long-term capital necessary for genuine economic transformation, he noted.

Sectoral, geographical distribution, a problem

Sectoral distribution of inflows further highlights the challenge. The bulk of the capital entering the country was directed toward the banking and financial services sectors, with only marginal allocations to manufacturing, agro-processing, infrastructure, and other real-sector activities.

While financial-sector inflows deepen liquidity and strengthen the banking system, they do not automatically translate into expansion of productive capacity. Yusuf warned that financial deepening without real-sector growth risks creating a liquidity-driven recovery that does little to expand employment or industrial output.

READ ALSO: Nigerian government has implemented major, politically difficult reforms – World Bank

Geographic concentration also presents a risk. Foreign capital inflows remain heavily concentrated among a small group of countries, notably the United Kingdom, the United States, and South Africa. Such concentration exposes Nigeria to policy changes, geopolitical developments, and monetary tightening cycles within a limited number of jurisdictions.

In addition, a substantial share of inflows is intermediated through a small cluster of international banks operating in Nigeria. While these institutions provide established global financial linkages, heavy reliance on a narrow group of intermediaries increases transmission risks should correspondent banking relationships or global liquidity conditions shift.

“A more resilient capital-flow structure requires both geographic diversification and broader financial intermediation channels,” he said.

Risk mitigation

To mitigate these vulnerabilities, CPPE stressed the need to convert short-term liquidity gains into long-term productive investment. Macroeconomic stabilisation efforts, including foreign exchange liberalisation and tighter monetary policy, have helped restore investor confidence. The next phase, however, must focus on structural competitiveness.

Reliable electricity supply, efficient transport systems, regulatory clarity, and improved contract enforcement mechanisms are critical to attracting durable FDI. Government must also provide targeted incentives for capital flows into export-oriented manufacturing, mineral processing, industrial parks, agro-processing, and infrastructure development, Yusuf noted.

Diversifying capital sources is equally important. Strategic engagement with Gulf sovereign wealth funds, Asian institutional investors, and intra-African capital under the African Continental Free Trade Area framework would broaden Nigeria’s investment base and reduce vulnerability to Western financial-cycle volatility.

In the short term, Nigeria continues to offer attractive yield opportunities in fixed-income instruments due to tight monetary policy and improved FX liquidity. However, CPPE’s head advised that sustainable growth will depend on whether policymakers can shift from portfolio-driven inflows to investment-led transformation.

READ ALSO: Rewane sees 2026 as turning point for Nigeria’s economy, naira, markets

Ultimately, while the $6 billion capital importation rebound is a clear signal that investor confidence is returning, its long-term impact will hinge on structural reforms that strengthen the productive base of the economy. Without such reforms, Yusuf said, the current recovery could prove fragile, leaving Nigeria exposed to the same volatility that has characterised past capital cycles.

“The central task before policymakers is clear: move from liquidity-driven recovery to investment-led transformation. Only by converting short-term capital inflows into long-term productive investment can Nigeria achieve sustainable growth, employment expansion, export diversification, and macroeconomic resilience.”